For this third assignment, you will complete a two-part assignment that explores potential research questions for your proposed topic intervention, and you will select a theory or model for the implementation of your evidence-based intervention.Part 1: Proposed Research QuestionsOngoing research is crucial to clarifying the research process and focusing the direction of research. To accomplish this, it is essential to develop strong research questions that can further focus the research and help make it relevant to your filed. In 250-500 words, propose ethical research questions for further study. Include the following:Propose three research questions that would further the study on the health care problem or issue you have selected for your topic.Discuss the parameters for developing ethical research questions. Describe potential ethical considerations for the questions you proposed.Part 2: Incorporating a Theory or ModelSelect a theory or model to assist with the implementation of your proposed evidence-based practice intervention. In 250-500 words, discuss the following:Summarize the theory or model. Explain why this theory or model is best for your proposed evidence-based intervention.Describe how you will apply the theory or model in the implementation of your evidence-based intervention.
Research Questions and Theory or Model – Rubric
Total 100 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than
Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
Research Questions
0 points
9.75 points
11.25 points
12.75 points
15 points
Research Questions
Fewer than two questions
are proposed. The questions
proposed are not research
questions or fail to further
study on the selected health
care problem or issue.
Only two research questions
are proposed. The proposed
questions are vague and do
not appear to encourage
further study on the selected
health care problem or issue.
Three research questions are
proposed. At least two of the
questions encourage further
study on the selected health
care problem or issue. Some
information or revision is
needed.
Three research questions are
proposed. Overall, the
questions encourage further
study on the selected health
care problem or issue.
Three well-written research
questions are proposed. The
questions are insightful and
encourage further study on
the selected health care
problem or issue.
Parameters for Developing 0 points
Ethical Research Questions
Parameters for developing
Parameters for Developing
ethical research questions
Ethical Research Questions
and potential ethical
considerations for the
proposed questions are not
discussed.
9.75 points
11.25 points
12.75 points
15 points
Parameters for developing
ethical research questions
and potential ethical
considerations for the
proposed questions are
incomplete.
Parameters for developing
ethical research questions
for the selected topic and
potential ethical
considerations for the
proposed questions are
outlined. Some information
or support is needed. The
narrative demonstrates a
general understanding of the
ethical aspects of developing
research questions.
Parameters for developing
ethical research questions
and potential ethical
considerations for the
proposed questions are
discussed. The narrative
demonstrates an
understanding of the ethical
aspects of developing
research questions.
Specific parameters for
developing ethical research
questions for the selected
topic and potential ethical
considerations for the
proposed questions are
thoroughly discussed. The
narrative demonstrates a
strong understanding of the
ethical aspects of developing
research questions.
Theory or Model
0 points
13 points
15 points
17 points
20 points
Theory or Model
A theory or model to assist
with the proposed evidencebased practice intervention,
including why the theory or
model is best for the
proposed evidence-based
intervention, is not
discussed.
A theory or model to assist
with the proposed evidencebased practice intervention,
including why the theory or
model is best for the
proposed evidence-based
intervention, is only partially
discussed.
A theory or model to assist
with the proposed evidencebased practice intervention,
including why the theory or
model is best for the
proposed evidence-based
intervention, is outlined.
Some information or support
is needed.
A theory or model to assist
with the proposed evidencebased practice intervention,
including why the theory or
model is best for the
proposed evidence-based
intervention, is discussed.
Minor detail or support is
needed for accuracy or
clarity.
A theory or model to assist
with the proposed evidencebased practice intervention,
including why the theory or
model is best for the
proposed evidence-based
intervention, is detailed. The
narrative is well supported.
Application of Theory or
Model to Implementation
of Intervention
0 points
13 points
15 points
17 points
20 points
How the theory or model will
be applied in the
implementation of the
evidence-based intervention
is not discussed.
How the theory or model will
be applied in the
implementation of the
evidence-based intervention
is only partially discussed.
A discussion for how the
theory or model will be
applied in the
implementation of the
evidence-based intervention
is presented. Some
information or support is
needed.
A discussion for how the
theory or model will be
applied in the
implementation of the
evidence-based intervention
is presented. The narrative
has adequate support and
rationale.
A detailed discussion for how
the theory or model will be
applied in the
implementation of the
evidence-based intervention
is presented in a logical and
well-supported narrative.
0 points
4.55 points
5.25 points
5.95 points
7 points
Paper lacks any discernible
Thesis is insufficiently
Thesis is apparent and
overall purpose or organizing developed or vague. Purpose appropriate to purpose.
claim is not clear.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
0 points
5.2 points
6.8 points
8 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion.
The conclusion does not support the claim made.
Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident.
There is a smooth progression of claims fromintroduction to conclusion.
Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Application of Theory or Model to. Implementation of
Intervention Thesis Development and
Purpose Thesis Development and
Purpose Argument Logic and
Construction Argument Logic and
Construction
6 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies.
The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than
Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
5 points
and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Mechanics of Writing
0 points
3.25 points
3.75 points
4.25 points
Includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate
language are employed.
Prose is largely free of Writer is clearly in command mechanical errors, although of standard, written, a few may be present. The
academic English.
writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Paper Format
0 points
3.25 points
3.75 points
4.25 points
5 points
Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
Template is not used appropriately, or
documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack
of control with formatting is
apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct,although some minor errors
may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are
correct.
Documentation of Sources
0 points
3.25 points
3.75 points
4.25 points
5 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment
and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some
formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is freeof error.
Citations, footnotes,
Sources are not documented.
references, bibliography, etc.,
as appropriate to assignment
and style.
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.