it is recommended that the length not exceed 3,000 words or approximately 11 double-spaced pages, including references, tables and figures.
I attach the instructions on how you should do the the literature review.
you have to be very careful about Duplicate Publication and Plagiarism. This goes to the World Respiratory Therapy Association in the United States.
This is the page where all the rules for doing the literature review are. References must be current and reliable sites PubMed Central… https://rc.rcjournal.com/content/author-guidelines
I was thinking about these topics but you can choose the one that best suits you.
Respiratory Care in COVID-19 Management: A review of the role of respiratory therapists and the effectiveness of various respiratory care interventions in managing COVID-19 patients, including ventilation strategies and proning.
High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Therapy in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS): An analysis of the use of HFNC therapy in ARDS patients, its effects on oxygenation and patient comfort, and its potential benefits over traditional oxygen therapy.
Environmental and Occupational Influences on Respiratory Health: Investigate the effects of air pollution, occupational hazards, and climate change on respiratory health and the role of respiratory care in mitigating these impacts.
Telehealth and Remote Monitoring in Respiratory Care: Explore the effectiveness and challenges of using telehealth and remote monitoring technologies in managing patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
Lambda Beta Society Scholarship Paper Scoring Rubric
SCHOLARSHIP CRITERIA CHECK LIST
Paper Identification Code:
(Last four digits of SSN)
Date Received:
1.
2.
3.
CRITERIA
Literature review relating to respiratory care. Paper
copy/electronic copy (either e-mail or disc)
Letter of recommendation for this scholarship
Completed Application
RECEIVED
Lambda Beta Society Scholarship Paper Scoring Rubric
Scoring Rubric for Lambda Beta Scholarship Papers
Relevance:
Element
The paper demonstrates clear
implications for the profession of
respiratory care. Areas of practice
may include cardiopulmonary
diagnostics, continuing
care/rehabilitation, management,
education, adult acute care,
perinatal/pediatric care, subacute care,
transport, or home respiratory care
and research.
0
1
2
3
Information has
little or nothing to
do with
contemporary
practice of
respiratory care.
Information
presented relates to
the practice of
respiratory care. No
details and/or
examples were
given.
Information
clearly relates to
the practice of
respiratory care.
It includes
supporting
details and/or
examples for
one or two
clinical
situations.
Information
clearly relates
to the practice
of respiratory
care. It
includes
supporting
details and/or
examples for
multiple
clinical
situations.
The paper is
cursory and does
not adequately
address any
element of
respiratory care.
The paper pulls
statements directly
from sources
without expansion.
The paper
contains several
direct statements
from resources,
not all
statements are
expanded to
show consistent
evidence of
critical thinking.
The paper
presents
critical and
supportive
information
from relevant
resources.
Critical
thinking is
demonstrated
consistently.
Weight this element x2
*
Content:
An appropriate amount of information
is presented. While the amount of
information presented will be
determined by the topic, it is
recommended that the length not
exceed 3,000 words or approximately
11 double-spaced pages, including
references, tables and figures
*
Weight this element x3
No summary is
provided.
Summary is present
but lacks
organization.
Summary is
present and well
organized.
Methodological Adequacy:
The method of reporting should
include an introduction which
addresses the theme or purpose and/or
a statement of the problem; a
background or overview of pertinent
literature; and, the body of the paper
should include documented
supporting evidence. Manuscripts
reporting empirical studies must have
clearly described designs, methods,
and clearly formulated
findings/conclusions supported by
valid, reliable data. Other manuscripts
(e.g., on theory development,
methodologic issues, or review of the
literature) must be supported by
appropriate documentation, reasoning
and/or examples.
Weight this element x3
*
The paper is not
adequate based
on the method of
presentation. It is
missing one or
more of the
required
methodological
elements.
The paper is
marginally adequate
based on the method
of presentation.
While all elements
are present based on
the methodological
choice, one or more
elements are
missing or the
findings/conclusions
superficial.
The paper is
adequate based
on the method of
presentation. All
elements are
present based on
the
methodological
choice; minor
errors are
present.
Summary is
present and
well
organized.
The paper
meets all of
the
requirements
of the
methodologic
choice in its
method of
presentation.
Also included
are supporting
details and/or
examples.
Lambda Beta Society Scholarship Paper Scoring Rubric
Element
Citations and References:
Manuscripts and citations should be
prepared in accordance with the RC
Journal format. Please see
http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/authorguidelines. Include citations for
images that are not open source in the
paper. Place the references at the end
of the paper. References should be
listed as they appear in the text, not
alphabetically. Include year, volume
number, and inclusive page numbers.
Double-space references.
0
Citations are not
included.
References are
not drawn from
an appropriate
scientific (e.g.,
peer reviewed)
literature base.
1
2
3
Citations do not
conform to RC
Journal
requirements.
Citations do not
conform to RC
Journal
requirements.
Citations are
cited
correctly.
References include,
but are not
consistently drawn,
from the scientific
literature.
References are
consistently
drawn from peer
reviewed
literature.
Aspects of paper are
too elementary.
The paper is
generally clear;
a few minor
points may be
confusing or not
well presented.
References are
consistently
drawn from
the peer
reviewed
literature.
Weight this element x2
Organization, Style, and
Proofreading:
A scholarly paper presents evidence
of critical thinking and the ability of
the student to show transition between
paragraphs and topics.
The presentation and article content
are the responsibility of the author.
Authors should make every attempt to
proof their article for errors in
spelling, sequencing of content,
structure and style before submitting
their article to Lambda Beta.
Weight this element x2
Presentation of paper is too elementary.
Logic of arguments is not made clear; transition between topics is not evident.
Numerous (>5) errors in grammar or spelling per page.
Organization of paper appears haphazard; transition between topics is not evident.
Several (3 to 5) errors in grammar or spelling per
page).
The paper is generally well organized; transition between topics is logical and shows evidence of critical thinking.
Few errors (